SmartSkin helps pharmaceutical manufacturers prepare for Annex 1 compliance

Published On: November 24, 2022

Annex 1 is now official. However, sterile medicinal product manufacturers started getting ready for it some time ago. Nevertheless, the time to finalize the road map and complete actions to achieve good standing with its requirements is now counted in months. Whether one focuses today on novel products and processes to be introduced to a new or existing manufacturing facility or whether one is working on products already in routine manufacturing, the requirements of this guidance are equally relevant. It is the most recent and relevant guidance on manufacturing sterile pharmaceuticals globally.

Establishing an integrated Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) across a facility is considered the grounding framework for a robust assurance of contamination prevention. The effectiveness and active management of such CCS imply access to detailed and, at times, advanced technical process knowledge within and across parenteral operations.

New insights-generating tools can be deployed in the interest of providing proactive means to identify, scientifically evaluate, and control potential risks to quality. And do so in accordance with Quality Risk Management (QRM) principles for processes, equipment, facilities and manufacturing activities.

Detecting, measuring and, most importantly, preventing contaminants originating from materials (i.e. glass or other visible/sub-visible particles) require technologies and methodologies that can easily point towards causal factors situated insight of a selected, qualified, or validated method of manufacturing. How well are the interactions behind so many line stoppages, glass related incidents causing defects and breakages understood? And if so, how high is the risk for creating situations that damage or enhance vulnerability to damage during and after manufacturing? Detecting, measuring, locating, and rapidly deciding on the course of action is possible when using “smart” replicas of the product format (i.e. vial, syringe, cartridge, pen injector) along its filling and packaging lines. When used routinely and systemically to generate “audits “by measuring forces at play across the container handling path, from washing to end of packaging, point of impact and risk are easily located and visualized. Effectiveness of corrective actions are rapidly measured and made visible.

If you have any questions about how SmartSkin can help you prepare for Annex 1, let us know. You can reach us at: info@smartskintech.com

Related Posts

Gloved hand holding a pharmaceutical glass vial in front of fill-finish manufacturing equipment during factory acceptance testing

Factory Acceptance Testing for Pharma Fill-Finish

When new fill-finish equipment arrives at your facility, the pressure to get it qualified and into production is real. Timelines are tight, budgets are fixed, and every delay has a cost. Factory acceptance testing is the stage where that pressure meets its first real test, and where the decisions you make have consequences that follow […]
Pharmaceutical manufacturing workers in cleanroom protective suits operating fill-finish production equipment in a sterile manufacturing facility.

Transferring Knowledge Along with Product: How CDMOs Reduce Variability, Improve Reliability, and Strengthen Sponsor Confidence Through Data-Driven Process Understanding

Fill-finish technology transfer is one of the most complex and risk-intensive moments in pharmaceutical manufacturing, and one of the most consequential for product quality, supply reliability, and sponsor confidence. It is a quintessential part of the CMC (Chemistry Manufacturing and Control) along the pre-commercial, commercial and post-commercial phase of a pharmaceutical product life cycle. Critical […]
Close-up of a pharmaceutical production line with plastic syringe components moving along a conveyor, while a technician in cleanroom attire monitors the process in the background.

Understanding Syringe Defects in Fill-Finish: Causes and Prevention Using a Mechanical Baseline

How mechanical shock, pressure, and transport instability create intermittent syringe defects in fill-finish lines Syringe defects in pharmaceutical fill-finish lines rarely occur in a predictable way. A line can operate at nominal speed for hours before a syringe suddenly cracks, breaks, or becomes damaged during transport. When this happens, teams investigate machine settings, glass quality, […]